Kobe's Problem shcuedule English Top Page E-mail to Yasui
Report and Information Profile
Earthquake LINK HOME
Hikolog(BLOG)
 

CHAIRMAN(Mr.Katsuhiko Nakamura) "Mayer Mr. Sasayama"

Mayer Mr.Sasayama

I�d like to reply to the member Mr.Yausi�s questions.

His questions regarding decentralization has been very wide various then maybe I will reply with in little bit abstractive or imply. In each concretely problems, I will answer to the each questions, again.

 

At first, the local autonomy is the basis. We can hear regarding Establish the local autonomy very often. We properly do the administration in Kobe until now. The point is, how people make their town or the area with creativity. I say we need the activity about that. In addition, I think people suppose to be move with it.

 

Then, at a starting point, the big city has a lot of prerequisite as itself but, the big city is the place what gather the people then people think about anything and make the rule to live.

So, administration is in a position to support this (like making rule by the people). Because, at the brought up, administration was not real at first � administration system was. In the question, point out the example of old foreign country (maybe he is talking about example by Napoleon in France), people have gathered but were without any guide ? guide by administration system was not available. However, they made town by their power or by themselves. What called inhabitant autonomy --- actually we still can see the example at a part of Swiss like the remainder --- time like them is for the inhabitant autonomy. I think, the administration system --- this is a supporter system to the inhabitant autonomy for attainment the things --- it is the kind of full time service by the kind of person --- like people asks wish to do something --- is the administration system like today�s public office.

Before the style like that, style was different but if we can call it carefully, it is the public office. Then, the public office stands on the reason what is supposes to be as supporter to the inhabitant autonomy.

 

Then, at both sides want to keep the town, then both Citizens and administration will work together and cooperation. This meant, we were made and making town with the mind like we have a word �Kyoudou (work in cooperation)� in basic plan, However, we are built the City but, things like human being build the City then we have the hazards that possibility of the City has destroyed by the human being even today. Because we have histories like in the questions, natural disasters, war or hanger to start the war and destroyed the City, already. Therefore, I think �we have to built the City by *Kyoudou*�  is the basis in the local autonomy.

Therefore, the important parts is, people want to be comfortable to live, want to live peacefully, as a matter of course. Then need to realize it. Also the City --- when people�s assembles became bigger, then the role of the administration in big cities comes up to very big. I think maybe that problem is onto any public organizations at all over the world.

Then we have many problems what impediment the establishment of the local autonomy like member has pointed out in the question. Authority or organizations became increasingly. However, the rule what made when establishing the town, are possible to works as shackles to them sometime and it is their behave --- this is a kind of way to explain --- then by the citizens like this example --- fact is possible to effect it like that way then we want to clear this problem. This is one of the answers. I think at the side of the administration what has been trusted, likewise the effect has comes up as obstruction to the undertaken works, today.

Then, authority what owned by the country --- or, even in the cases at public organizations or Kobe City, the trend became into �transfer the authority� by the stream like that.

We made pressure to the Government or the relative agencies regarding ordinance -designated cities for the transfer the authority, with studying between ordinance-designated cities at same time. I think this is as members known about this because we already announced about this when each steps of the budget demands.

I think grapple with the kind of problem about deregulation or administrative reform will be continuing with on each time to the future.

Especially, the report �Tomorrow�s Big Cities look from Citizens� life� what is called �Asukon (a gathering for friendly discussion to tomorrow)� is one of the result in discussion at between ordinance -designated cities has been fixed before last year and introductioning. This report has been included 80 concretely examples of the transfer the authorities.

Regarding administration researching section in Prefecture, at my understanding, they are thinking about concretely menu. However, at the step in now, they are examining regard the menu of transfer the authorities from Prefecture to the non- ordinance -designated cities.

So, Kobe City has authorized regarding entrusted business exceptionally. Moreover, this authorization is in Kobe City. Then we have no special problem. However, I never hear any argues about transfer the authorities to the Kobe or any ordinance -designated cities depends on how we look at it.

Therefore, people make the comments �the public organization has enough stamina or ability to do it?� like we are looking the points out stories on the newspapers many times. Therefore, we have to have the enough ability correspondence to the decentralization.

Regarding problems like this, I think we would like to endeavor the future enough. Especially, in Kobe�s case we were explained about transfer the authorities frequently. In addition, the Cities and Towns meeting asked regarding transfer the authorities to the prefectural governor. However, the cases between ordinance -designated cities and Cities and Towns are different at the content. Then I think I would like to keep watching regarding this point.

If, we have the problem regarding deregulation to build the comfortable City, I think truly we are going to demand it at the first request. I think we will do the things with the purpose that opinion report regarding the transfer the authorities presented from the Municipal.

Kobe City used be announced regarding this problem after happened because not exact meant like the old history tells �begin the things from the person who speak it first� but included meant. Then we doing the transfer the authorities one step faster as a measure devised to deal for ready to the action of the transfer the authorities by the Government as the one of the answer to the question of �how Kobe City have to do�.

We have too many problems then no time to explain the each. For example, at the town planning, frequently discussed �if little bit up the limit of the floor area ratio, will be very effective� in the municipal, or published in the newspaper recently. More the lots of ideas are available like the basement needs more money then count off from the floor area ratio calculation.

I can not understand the member has asking as pick up the problems at each one or think about implies several things then asking to me. However, please give me extension for the time being.�

Return | NEXT


Toshihiko Yasui
OFFICE: 2-15-27 Mikage-honmachi, Higashinada, Kobe, Hyogo 658-0048 JAPAN
E-mail yasui@yasui.net
Voice 81-78-842-3020 FAX 81-78-841-3090

For technical things regarding this web site, please mail to webmaster@yasui.net .

Web Design � DIGIHOUND LLC. NM USA/ Kobe, Japan 2002